From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Betts v. Marecki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1998
247 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 4, 1998

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint and cross claims against defendant John Marecki dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motions of defendant John Marecki for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against him. Marecki, the driver of the second vehicle in a chain-reaction motor vehicle accident, testified at an examination before trial that he had his foot on the brake and his vehicle was at a complete stop when it was hit from the rear by the last vehicle in the chain, driven by defendant Jerritt S. Wilson. Marecki established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and neither plaintiffs nor the remaining defendants raised a triable issue of fact whether Marecki was negligent in the operation of his vehicle. Thus, Marecki is entitled to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint and cross claims against him (see, Sollecito v. Scott, 188 A.D.2d 824). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Betts v. Marecki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1998
247 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Betts v. Marecki

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH J. BETTS et al., Respondents, v. JOHN MARECKI, Appellant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 422

Citing Cases

Zielinski v. Van Pelt

Finally, defendant Joseph F. David's vehicle, in which plaintiff was a passenger, collided with the rear of…

Randolph v. Crane

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of Suzanne M. Crane (defendant) for summary judgment…