From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Best v. Law Firm of Queller and Fisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 30, 2000.

December 27, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated October 14, 1999, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Arthur Best and Debra Best, Freeport, N.Y., appellants pro se.

L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita Contini, LLP, Garden City, N Y (Matthew K. Flanagan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In a prior proceeding, the Supreme Court found that the defendants in this action, who were the attorneys for the plaintiffs in that proceeding, were entitled to their agreed-upon legal fee. Inasmuch as that determination necessarily decided that there was no malpractice, the plaintiffs are precluded from asserting a cause of action alleging malpractice (see, Kagan Meat Poultry v. Kalter, 70 A.D.2d 632).

Moreover, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the causes of action alleging fraud and breach of contract and for indemnification, since these arise from the same facts as the malpractice cause of action, and thus are duplicative of that cause of action (see, Mecca v. Shang, 258 A.D.2d 569).


Summaries of

Best v. Law Firm of Queller and Fisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Best v. Law Firm of Queller and Fisher

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR BEST, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LAW FIRM OF QUELLER AND FISHER, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 397

Citing Cases

Rafter v. Liddle

In this regard, plaintiff claims that the January 4, 1990 retainer agreement containing her signature is a…

Mahler v. Campagna

Accordingly, the third cause of action was not subject to dismissal on grounds of arbitration and award, res…