From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Best Buy Stores v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 10, 2008
Civil No. 05-2310 (DSD/JJG) (D. Minn. Jul. 10, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-2310 (DSD/JJG).

July 10, 2008


ORDER


This matter comes before the court on plaintiff Best Buy Stores, L.P.'s objection to the May 12, 2008, order of Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham. In her order, the magistrate judge denied Best Buy's request for leave to bring a motion to compel and for sanctions after expiration of the pretrial scheduling order's deadline for such motions because Best Buy did not show good cause for the delay. Upon review of the parties' submissions, and the file and record herein, the court determines that the magistrate judge's order was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a); D. Minn. LR 72.1(b)(2). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the United States Magistrate Judge dated May 12, 2008, [Docket No. 615] is affirmed in all respects.


Summaries of

Best Buy Stores v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 10, 2008
Civil No. 05-2310 (DSD/JJG) (D. Minn. Jul. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Best Buy Stores v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Best Buy Stores, L.P., Plaintiff, v. Developers Diversified Realty…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jul 10, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 05-2310 (DSD/JJG) (D. Minn. Jul. 10, 2008)

Citing Cases

Hasham v. California State Board of Equalization

The result is the same if weekend days are not counted based on Rule 6(a)(2) applying to the three-day period…