From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Besser v. Esurance Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 25, 2024
3:24-cv-05207-TMC (W.D. Wash. Jul. 25, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-05207-TMC

07-25-2024

ADAM BESSER; KELSEY BESSER, Plaintiff, v. ESURANCE INSURANCE COMPANY; ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

TIFFANY M. CARTWRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter comes before the Court on its own motion. On June 28, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiffs Adam Besser and Kelsey Besser to show cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for their failure to timely serve Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Dkt. 9. The Court gave the Bessers twenty-one days to respond to the Order. Id. This deadline passed without them making any filings.

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to timely serve Defendants. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (“If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court- on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff- must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant ....”).


Summaries of

Besser v. Esurance Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 25, 2024
3:24-cv-05207-TMC (W.D. Wash. Jul. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Besser v. Esurance Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ADAM BESSER; KELSEY BESSER, Plaintiff, v. ESURANCE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 25, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-05207-TMC (W.D. Wash. Jul. 25, 2024)