From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bess v. Village of East Hampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1996
225 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 4, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the record supports the Supreme Court's finding that the defendant did not receive the requisite written notice of the alleged defective condition, and there was no evidence that the defendant affirmatively created the condition, summary judgment was properly awarded in favor of the defendant ( see, Village Law § 6-628; Mollahan v Village of Port Washington N., 153 A.D.2d 881; Conlon v Village of Pleasantville, 146 A.D.2d 736; Parella v Levin, 111 A.D.2d 750). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bess v. Village of East Hampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1996
225 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Bess v. Village of East Hampton

Case Details

Full title:BONITA BESS, Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF EAST HAMPTON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 718

Citing Cases

Stern v. Incorporated Village of Flower Hill

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The…

Amarante v. Village of Tarrytown

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, a municipal parking lot falls within the scope of Village Law § 6-628…