From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Sanders

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 20, 2009
CV 08-1319-VBF (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2009)

Summary

stating thatpost-Rodriguez, the BOP may exercise its discretion under § 3621(b) to place an inmate in an RRC, but the BOP is not obligated to do so

Summary of this case from Calloway v. Thomas

Opinion


DARRELL T. BERRY, Petitioner, v. LINDA SANDERS, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 08-1319-VBF (MAN) United States District Court, C.D. California. March 20, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing Objections has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. The Court accepts and adopts the Report and the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition is granted for the reasons set forth in the Report; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Berry v. Sanders

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 20, 2009
CV 08-1319-VBF (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2009)

stating thatpost-Rodriguez, the BOP may exercise its discretion under § 3621(b) to place an inmate in an RRC, but the BOP is not obligated to do so

Summary of this case from Calloway v. Thomas
Case details for

Berry v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL T. BERRY, Petitioner, v. LINDA SANDERS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 20, 2009

Citations

CV 08-1319-VBF (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2009)

Citing Cases

SASS v. THOMAS

Petitioner's position confuses the BOP's duty to consider placing an inmate in an RRC under § 3624(c) with…

Rowe v. Quintana

eam considered section 3621(b) factors in making determination); Smith v. Sanders, 2009 WL 2900317, at *5-*6…