From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Sep 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1713-P (W.D. La. Sep. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1713-P

09-25-2012

CORTEZ BERRY v. M. MITCHELL, ET AL.


JUDGE FOOTE


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY


JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack of written objections filed by Plaintiff and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 25th day of SEPTEMBER, 2012.

_______________

ELIZABETH ERNY FOOTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Berry v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Sep 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1713-P (W.D. La. Sep. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Berry v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:CORTEZ BERRY v. M. MITCHELL, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1713-P (W.D. La. Sep. 25, 2012)