From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berrien v. U.S. Phosphoric Products

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 22, 1963
157 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 1963)

Opinion

No. 32960.

November 22, 1963.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

David Goldman and Ephraim Collins, Miami, for petitioner.

M.W. Graybill, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, Tampa, for U.S. Phosphoric Products.

Burnis T. Coleman and Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 24, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C.J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Berrien v. U.S. Phosphoric Products

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 22, 1963
157 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 1963)
Case details for

Berrien v. U.S. Phosphoric Products

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. BERRIEN, PETITIONER, v. U.S. PHOSPHORIC PRODUCTS, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 22, 1963

Citations

157 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 1963)

Citing Cases

University of Florida v. McLarthy

Accordingly, if an order is entered on an initial claim, and another claim or a petition to modify the order…

Dean v. McLeod

" In a similar situation, the Commission came to a similar decision in Berrien v. United States Phosphoric…