From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernholz v. Bernholz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 1992
184 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 8, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ambrosio, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by granting the motion to the extent of vacating the seventh decretal paragraph of the judgment dated April 27, 1987, and otherwise denying the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for an inquest at which both parties may participate, and a new determination with respect to the distribution of the parties' marital property.

The defendant wife failed to present either a reasonable excuse for her default or a meritorious defense to the action. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly refused to vacate so much of the judgment as granted the plaintiff husband a divorce (see, Meisl v. Meisl, 153 A.D.2d 839, 840; Diachuk v. Diachuk, 117 A.D.2d 985).

With regard to the provisions for distribution of the parties' marital property, an inquest should be taken to consider the issues (see, Otto v. Otto, 150 A.D.2d 57). The purpose of the inquest, whether in the nature of a hearing or in the submission of written proof, is to provide the court with the requisite evidentiary and factual basis to set forth the statutory factors to be considered by it (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5]; Meisl v. Meisl, supra; Gainer v. Gainer, 100 A.D.2d 533). That the judgment is entered upon the default of one of the parties does not obviate the court's obligation to hold an inquest on the issue of the distribution of marital property and to set forth its reasoning based upon the factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5) (see, Otto v. Otto, supra; Ettinger v Ettinger, 107 Misc.2d 675).

Since the court did not comply with the pertinent provisions of the Domestic Relations Law, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for an inquest and new determination with respect to the distribution of the parties' marital property. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bernholz v. Bernholz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 1992
184 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Bernholz v. Bernholz

Case Details

Full title:HENRY C. BERNHOLZ, Respondent, v. MARIAN BERNHOLZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 8, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Matter of Dot E.W

The notice and hearing requirements statutorily prescribed as necessary in all Mental Hygiene Law article 81…

Rolston v. Rolston

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. To vacate a judgment entered upon a default, the movant must…