From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernal v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas
Jan 4, 2012
No. 04-11-00811-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. 04-11-00811-CR

01-04-2012

Ray Roland BERNAL, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION


From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR10961

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
DISMISSED

The trial court's certification in this appeal states that "this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." The clerk's record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court's certification accurately reflects that the underlying case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, "The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules." TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Because the trial court's certification does not show that the appellant has a right of appeal, rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH


Summaries of

Bernal v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas
Jan 4, 2012
No. 04-11-00811-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Bernal v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ray Roland BERNAL, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

No. 04-11-00811-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2012)