From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berk v. Ventura

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 16, 2000.

December 12, 2000.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Anthony M. Ventura appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ponterio J.), dated July 14, 1999, which denied his motion for leave to vacate a judgment entered against him upon his failure to appear or answer.

Jeffrey Eisenberg, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Norman Delman, Staten Island, N.Y. (Thomas Torto and Michael G. Levin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to show a meritorious defense to the action and therefore was not entitled to vacatur of the judgment entered against him (see, CPLR 317; Nicolosi v. Sleuth Sec. Sys., 248 A.D.2d 521).


Summaries of

Berk v. Ventura

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Berk v. Ventura

Case Details

Full title:JACK M. BERK, RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY M. VENTURA, APPELLANT, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 12, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 181

Citing Cases

Springer v. Linden Seventh Day Adventist Church

In order to allege a viable claim for quantum meruit based on services rendered, the defendant must have…

Saavedra v. 64 Annfield Court Corp.

Therefore, the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as against Ultimate One Construction Corp. See, Garcia v.…