From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berglund v. Boeing Company, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jun 22, 2006
Civil No. 02-193-AS (D. Or. Jun. 22, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 02-193-AS.

June 22, 2006

David J. Hollander HOLLANDER LEBENBAUM GANNICOTT Portland, OR.

Frederick M. Morgan, Jr. VOLKEMA THOMAS, LPA Cincinnati, OH.

Neil J. Evans UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Portland, OR, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Calvin L. Keith Steve Y. Koh PERKINS COIE, LLP Portland, OR, Attorneys for Defendant.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Donald C. Ashmanskas filed Findings and Recommendation (#90) on June 1, 2006, in the above-entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findingsde novo review. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas's Findings and Recommendation (#90) dated June 1, 2006, in its entirety. Boeing Company's motion (#76) to dismiss Count One of relator's second amended complaint is denied. Further, the FCA allegations regarding the hundreds of aircraft sold by Boeing using financing guaranteed by the United States Export-Import Bank, including paragraph one on page 34 of the second amended complaint, are stricken pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Berglund v. Boeing Company, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jun 22, 2006
Civil No. 02-193-AS (D. Or. Jun. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Berglund v. Boeing Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CLIFF BERGLUND, Plaintiff, v. BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jun 22, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 02-193-AS (D. Or. Jun. 22, 2006)

Citing Cases

Wortman v. All Nippon Airways

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 517, the United States may submit a statement in a case expressing its views on…