From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bergin v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 2008
51 A.D.3d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-01148.

May 13, 2008.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered December 22, 2006, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Steve Marchelos, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Patricia Germanakos of counsel), for appellants.

Burns, Russo, Tamigi Reardon, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (John T. Pieret of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Balkin, Dickerson and Belen, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The infant plaintiff Alexandra Bergin allegedly was injured when she fell from a horizontal ladder apparatus at a playground owned by the defendant Town of Oyster Bay. As the infant plaintiff reached for the third rung of the horizontal ladder, her hand slipped from the rung and she fell to the ground. The plaintiffs alleged that the injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff were the result of inadequate ground cover on the playground surface beneath the horizontal ladder.

The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting evidence that it maintained the playground in a reasonably safe condition ( see Swan v Town of Brookhaven, 32 AD3d 1012, 1013; Capotosto v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr., 2 AD3d 384, 386 ; Banks v Freeport Union Free School Dist, 302 AD2d 341, 341-342; Lopez v Freeport Union Free School Dist., 288 AD2d 355, 356). The nonmandatory United States Consumer Product Safety Commission guidelines referred to by the plaintiffs, as well as the other proof offered in opposition to the motion, was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether there was a dangerous or defective condition at the playground on the day of the accident ( see Swan v Town of Brookhaven, 32 AD3d at 1013; Capotosto v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr., 2 AD3d at 386; Merson v Syosset Cent School Dist, 286 AD2d 668, 670; cf. Gonzalez v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers, 298 AD2d 358, 359).


Summaries of

Bergin v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 2008
51 A.D.3d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Bergin v. Town of Oyster Bay

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDRA BERGIN et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4452
858 N.Y.S.2d 318

Citing Cases

Daefler v. Briarcliff Manor Union Free

We disagree. The defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law…

Villatoro v. Town of Babylon

However, a municipality is not an insurer of the safety of those who use its facilities, and its only duty is…