From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bergin v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 19, 2015
128 A.D.3d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

15163, 101247/13

05-19-2015

In re Timothy BERGIN, Petitioner, v. Raymond W. KELLY, etc., et al., Respondents.

Strazzullo Law Firm P.C., Brooklyn (Salvatore E. Strazzullo of counsel), for petitioner. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth S. Natrella of counsel), for respondents.


Strazzullo Law Firm P.C., Brooklyn (Salvatore E. Strazzullo of counsel), for petitioner.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth S. Natrella of counsel), for respondents.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., ACOSTA, SAXE, MANZANET–DANIELS, CLARK, JJ.

Opinion

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated May 20, 2013, which dismissed petitioner from his position as a New York City police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Michael D. Stallman, J.], entered December 12, 2013), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the findings that petitioner committed larceny by withdrawing money from his girlfriend's bank account without consent; that he made false statements in an accident report; and that he had an unapproved absence and made false statements regarding a separate purported approval of an absence (see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 180–181, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183 [1978] ). There exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the Deputy Commissioner of Trials (see Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443–444, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193 [1987] ).

Given the seriousness of the sustained charges, and inasmuch as respondent Commissioner “is accountable to the public for the integrity of the Department,” the penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness (see Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 38, 724 N.Y.S.2d 680, 747 N.E.2d 1280 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted] ).


Summaries of

Bergin v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 19, 2015
128 A.D.3d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Bergin v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In re Timothy Bergin, Petitioner, v. Raymond W. Kelly, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 19, 2015

Citations

128 A.D.3d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
128 A.D.3d 543
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 4252