From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berbling v. Glaser

City Court of New York — General Term
Apr 1, 1893
3 Misc. 624 (N.Y. Misc. 1893)

Opinion

April, 1893.

Roech Fennel, for defendant (appellant).

Phillips Avery, for plaintiff (respondent).


On June 12, 1891, the defendant purchased from Messrs. Idler Sutton, a restaurant in Stone street, this city. In addition to the purchase price, $4,000, mentioned in the bill of sale, it appears that defendant, as a further consideration, agreed to assume and pay the debts of Idler Sutton, contracted as proprietors of said restaurant. One of the debtors was the plaintiff, to whom was owing $363.85.

If there is sufficient evidence in the case establishing affirmatively the consideration or purchase price for said restaurant, as contended for by plaintiff, then there is no doubt that defendant, by making such agreement with Idler Sutton, became not surety or guarantor for the payment of their debts above mentioned, but principal, and liable to such creditors previously and as original debtors, and their liability to pay such debts established.

The question "whether or not such was the consideration price for said restaurant and the agreement made between defendant and Idler Sutton," was submitted to the jury and they found in the affirmative. A careful perusal of the whole evidence in the case convinces us that their finding was authorized and justified.

Finding no error, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

McGOWN, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Berbling v. Glaser

City Court of New York — General Term
Apr 1, 1893
3 Misc. 624 (N.Y. Misc. 1893)
Case details for

Berbling v. Glaser

Case Details

Full title:BERBLING v . GLASER

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: Apr 1, 1893

Citations

3 Misc. 624 (N.Y. Misc. 1893)

Citing Cases

Lyon v. Clochessy

"One who purchases a business agreeing to assume as part of the consideration the debts of the sellers,…