From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benton Holden, Inc. v. Central R.R

Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court
Jan 14, 1938
196 A. 352 (N.J. 1938)

Opinion

Argued October term, 1937.

Decided January 14th, 1938.

On appeal from the court of chancery, whose opinion is reported in 122 N.J. Eq. 309.

Mr. Joseph R. Kane and Mr. Samuel Koestler, for the complainant-appellant.

Mr. Charles E. Miller, for the Central Railroad Company.

Mr. John A. Bernhard, for the board of public utility commissioners.

Messrs. Haines Chanalis, for P.T. Cox Contracting Company, Incorporated.


The proofs, carefully examined, abundantly support the findings of the learned vice-chancellor from whose decree the present appeal is taken and we also agree with two findings of law applicable thereto.

The decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Benton Holden, Inc. v. Central R.R

Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court
Jan 14, 1938
196 A. 352 (N.J. 1938)
Case details for

Benton Holden, Inc. v. Central R.R

Case Details

Full title:BENTON HOLDEN, INCORPORATED, a corporation, complainant-appellant, v…

Court:Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court

Date published: Jan 14, 1938

Citations

196 A. 352 (N.J. 1938)
196 A. 352

Citing Cases

Van Name v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

"There is no power, the exercise of which is more delicate, which requires greater caution, deliberation and…

van Name v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

"There is no power the exercise of which is more delicate, which requires greater caution, deliberation, and…