From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bens v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 26, 2010
399 F. App'x 794 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6002.

Submitted: October 19, 2010.

Decided: October 26, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-03050-WDQ).

Wendy Bens, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua L. Kaul, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Wendy Bens appeals the district court's order denying his habeas corpus action brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Bens v. United States, No. l:09-cv-03050-WDQ (D.Md. Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Bens v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 26, 2010
399 F. App'x 794 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Bens v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Wendy BENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 26, 2010

Citations

399 F. App'x 794 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Bens v. Grondolsky

The court found that the petition presented incomprehensible statements that seemingly had no relationship to…

Bens v. Grondolsky

The court found that the petition presented incomprehensible statements that seemingly had no relationship to…