From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 21, 2002
82 S.W.3d 397 (Tex. App. 2002)

Summary

holding no error preserved where appellant did not move to suppress or otherwise object to evidence allegedly seized as result of unlawful search

Summary of this case from Bell v. State

Opinion

No. 03-01-00058-CR

Filed: March 21, 2002

Appeal from The District Court Of Milam County, 20th Judicial District No. 20,206-CR, Honorable JACK HAMPTON, Judge Presiding.

Michael D. Goains, Goains Goains, P.C., Cameron, for appellant.

Kerry M. Spears, County and District Attorney, Cameron, for appellee.

Before Chief Justice ABOUSSIE, Justices B. A. SMITH and PURYEAR.


A jury found appellant Jermaud Desmond Bennett guilty of possessing less than four grams of cocaine with intent to deliver. See Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (c) (West Supp. 2002). The jury assessed punishment, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for forty-five years and a $10,000 fine. We will affirm.

Appellant's first and second points of error assert violations of article V, section 7 of the Texas Constitution. That section provides that a district court "shall conduct its proceedings at the county seat of the county in which the case is pending, except as otherwise provided by law. He shall hold the regular terms of his Court at the County Seat of each County in his district in such manner as may be prescribed by law." Tex. Const. art. V, § 7 (emphasis added). The seat of Milam County is Cameron, but appellant's trial was held in Rockdale.

The commissioners court in counties with a population of less than 30,000 "may provide for, operate, and maintain a branch courthouse outside the county seat." Tex. Loc. Gov't Code Ann. § 292.0231(b) (West 1999). "On approval of the commissioners court . . . a court . . . may . . . conduct any function at the branch courthouse that [it] is authorized to conduct at the courthouse located inside the county seat." Id. § 292.0231(d). On December 22, 1995, the Milam County Commissioners' Court designated the Roger Hashem Juvenile Justice Center in Rockdale as a branch courthouse and approved its use as a branch courthouse by the 20th District Court. See Tex.R.Evid. 204 (judicial notice of county ordinances). No violation of article V, section 7 is shown. Points of error one and two are overruled.

The population of Milam County according to the 2000 census is 24,238. Texas Almanac at 232 (2001).

In his third point of error, appellant asserts that the court should have suppressed evidence seized as a result of an unlawful search. Appellant does not specify the evidence in question, but we assume he refers to the cocaine found during the search incident to his arrest for public intoxication. Appellant did not move to suppress this evidence and did not otherwise object to its admission. No error is presented. See Tex.R.App.P. 33.1; Tex.R.Evid. 103(a).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Bennett v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 21, 2002
82 S.W.3d 397 (Tex. App. 2002)

holding no error preserved where appellant did not move to suppress or otherwise object to evidence allegedly seized as result of unlawful search

Summary of this case from Bell v. State

holding that "[n]o error is preserved" where appellant did not move to suppress or otherwise object to evidence allegedly seized as result of unlawful search

Summary of this case from Bell v. State
Case details for

Bennett v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jermaud Desmond Bennett, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Mar 21, 2002

Citations

82 S.W.3d 397 (Tex. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Bell v. State

This statement in his affidavit is insufficient to preserve the issue for appeal. See Krause v. State, 243…

Richards v. State

Appellant, however, made no objection to the introduction of the cocaine and did not move to suppress the…