From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Orchard

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 23, 1926
134 A. 519 (Ch. Div. 1926)

Opinion

09-23-1926

BENNETT v. ORCHARD.

Simon M. Seley, of Newark, for complainant. William V. Azzoli, of Newark, for defendant.


(Syllabus by the Court.)

Suit by James P. Bennett against Emma B. Orchard to foreclose a mortgage. Bill dismissed.

Simon M. Seley, of Newark, for complainant.

William V. Azzoli, of Newark, for defendant.

BACKES, Vice Chancellor. The bill is in the usual form, to foreclose a mortgage by a married woman, in which her husband did not join. The document is ineffective as a mortgage lien and incapable of foreclosure. Realty Title & Mortgage Co. v. Schaaf, 81 n. J. Eq. 115. 85 A. 602.

The mortgage was given to secure a preexisting debt and does not come within the principle of the cited cases that a lien will be declared and enforced against the separate estate of a married woman for a debt contracted by her on the credit of her estate and which she intended to charge therewith by the mortgage sought to be foreclosed.

Bill dismissed.


Summaries of

Bennett v. Orchard

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 23, 1926
134 A. 519 (Ch. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Bennett v. Orchard

Case Details

Full title:BENNETT v. ORCHARD.

Court:COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Sep 23, 1926

Citations

134 A. 519 (Ch. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

Kaffitz v. Clawson.

Her husband did not join with her in the execution of the bond and mortgage The insistence is that by reason…

Dreier v. Pomeroy

Obviously, if it had the effect argued by complainant the Legislature would not have enacted section 8h in…