From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 17, 2012
CASE NO: 5:12CV00368 BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO: 5:12CV00368 BSM

12-17-2012

MARIO BENNETT ADC #123269 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 8] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and the objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is found that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Mario Bennett's petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 1] is dismissed with prejudice.

2. In accordance with Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is denied.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bennett v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 17, 2012
CASE NO: 5:12CV00368 BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Bennett v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:MARIO BENNETT ADC #123269 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Dec 17, 2012

Citations

CASE NO: 5:12CV00368 BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2012)