From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Bintz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 17, 2002
290 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

90158

January 17, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Donald M. Bennett, Fishkill, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting interference with a facility employee and harassment. In the misbehavior report, the reporting correction officer alleged that he had observed petitioner standing at the medication window in the facility's infirmary carrying on a lengthy discussion with the nurse who was on duty. As evidenced by a log entry, entered a week earlier, the officer had previously admonished petitioner to desist from bothering this nurse. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented in the form of the misbehavior report, the log entry, a memorandum authored by the nurse who averred that petitioner had made inappropriately personal comments to her on several occasions and that she had twice asked him to stop, and petitioner's own testimony wherein he conceded that he had given the nurse personal compliments on previous occasions (see, Matter of Hamlett v. Strack, 273 A.D.2d 587; Matter of Kalwasinski v. Senkowski, 244 A.D.2d 738, 739). Petitioner's assertion that the misbehavior report was filed against him in retaliation for grievances that he had filed against another nurse arising out of unrelated incidents is not supported by the record and, in any event, raised issues of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Flowers v. Barkley, 244 A.D.2d 682, 683). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his allegation of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Bennett v. Bintz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 17, 2002
290 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Bennett v. Bintz

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DONALD M. BENNETT, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL J. BINTZ, AS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 17, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 495

Citing Cases

Vega v. Selsky

In his testimony, petitioner disputed the officer's account, asserting that the officer had initially…

Law v. Goord

The first decision, finding petitioner guilty of refusing to obey a direct order, is supported by substantial…