From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benn v. Borden's Starlac Dry Milk Product

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 9, 1971
438 F.2d 523 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 24530.

February 9, 1971.

Hersey Benn, in pro. per.

Cushing, Cullinan, Hancock Rothert, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before HAMLEY, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.


Hersey Benn, a prisoner of the State of California, appeals from an order of the district court denying leave to file a complaint in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). According to Benn's motion, the complaint would name, as defendant, "Borden's Starlac Dry Milk Product, et al." Benn seeks damages from the defendant by reason of illness assertedly suffered by him as a result of drinking defendant's "Starlac" milk obtained from the prison canteen. Benn alleges that harmful bacteria had been found in this milk product.

An order refusing to grant the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis in a civil action must be affirmed unless it appears that the discretion vested in the district court by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) has been abused. Williams v. Field, 394 F.2d 329, 332 (9th Cir. 1968).

It appears from Benn's motion papers that he has not, and cannot, allege facts stating a claim for damages under any head of federal jurisdiction. Accordingly the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Benn v. Borden's Starlac Dry Milk Product

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 9, 1971
438 F.2d 523 (9th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

Benn v. Borden's Starlac Dry Milk Product

Case Details

Full title:Hersey BENN, Appellant, v. BORDEN'S STARLAC DRY MILK PRODUCT et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 9, 1971

Citations

438 F.2d 523 (9th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

West v. Procunier

The order purports to do no more than permit pre-filing review of the complaints or petitions by a district…