From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belyski v. Pedone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1997
240 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 23, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The infant plaintiff was bitten by a dog owned by the decedent Doris Belyski and harbored at the residence of the defendants Guy and Josephine Pedone, where the decedent had resided. One who harbors a domestic animal will be held liable for injuries caused by the animal if that person knows or should know that the animal has vicious propensities ( cf., Arbegast v. Board of Educ., 65 N.Y.2d 161; Lynch v. Nacewicz, 126 A.D.2d 708). Summary judgment was improperly granted here since a question of fact was presented as to whether the respondents knew or should have known, on the day of the incident, that the dog exhibited vicious propensities.

Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Belyski v. Pedone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1997
240 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Belyski v. Pedone

Case Details

Full title:KRISTEN A. BELYSKI, an Infant, by Her Parent and Natural Guardian, JOANN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 1007

Citing Cases

Matthew H. v. Cnty. of Nassau

However, no liability can be found against a defendant who neither owned, harbored, nor exercised dominion…

DOW v. BECK

The evidence submitted in support of her motion for summary judgment, including her own deposition testimony,…