Opinion
December, 1915.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Beltz v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh R
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1915
171 App. Div. 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Summaries of
Beltz v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh R
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1915
171 App. Div. 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for
Beltz v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh R
Case Details
Full title:John Beltz, Respondent, v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1915
Citations
171 App. Div. 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Citing Cases
Upper Merion Township v. Bridgeport Borough
Appellants contend that this method of revival of dead laws directly violated the clause of the Constitution…
Rock v. PhiladelphiaAppellant does not contend that the state may not, under its police power and in order to protect the health…