From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beltran v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 16, 2015
Case No. ED CV 13-2335 MWF (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 13-2335 MWF (MRW)

03-16-2015

LOUIS PAUL BELTRAN, Petitioner, v. FRED FOULK, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATE: March 16, 2015

/s/_________

HON. MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Beltran v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 16, 2015
Case No. ED CV 13-2335 MWF (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Beltran v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS PAUL BELTRAN, Petitioner, v. FRED FOULK, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 16, 2015

Citations

Case No. ED CV 13-2335 MWF (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2015)

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. Valenzuela

lleged ignorance of the law, lack of legal sophistication and lack of legal assistance cannot justify…

Meza v. Pallares

Even an inmate's illiteracy is insufficient. Beltran v. Foulk, 2015 WL 1268322, at *3 (C.D. Cal. March…