From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belton v. Main

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jun 6, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-6022 (ES) (D.N.J. Jun. 6, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-6022 (ES)

06-06-2018

JAMAL BELTON, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL MAIN, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Jamal Belton, a civilly committed individual who is currently confined at the Special Treatment Unit at East Jersey State Prison in Avenel, New Jersey, seeks to bring this civil action in forma pauperis, asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The entire fee to be paid in advance of filing a civil complaint is $400. That fee includes a filing fee of $350 plus an administrative fee of $50, for a total of $400. If in forma pauperis status is denied, the litigant must pay the full $400, including the $350 filing fee and the $50 administrative fee, before the complaint will be filed.

In this action, Plaintiff submitted a complete in forma pauperis application (D.E. No. 1-1), however, he used the form for prisoners. As stated above, Plaintiff is not a prisoner, but rather a civilly committed individual. The prisoner and non-prisoner in forma pauperis applications require different information. Therefore, the Court will deny his in forma pauperis application without prejudice. The Court will direct the Clerk of the Court to (1) administratively terminate this action and (2) send Plaintiff a blank "Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis-Non Prisoner (AO 239)." The Court will provide Plaintiff with 30 days in which to complete and sign the in forma pauperis application and re-submit the application to the Court.

The Court notes that Plaintiff indicated on his prisoner in forma pauperis application that he is not employed at his current institution. (D.E No. 1-1, ¶ 2). However, some of the facts alleged in his Complaint suggest he may have a job. (D.E. No. 1, Complaint at 9). Plaintiff is advised to ensure that any subsequent in forma pauperis application is accurate in its entirety. --------

THEREFORE, it is on this 6th day of June 2018;

ORDERED that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this case, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee; Plaintiff is informed that administrative termination is not a "dismissal" for purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, see Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands, 705 F.3d 80, 84 n.2 (3d Cir. 2013) (describing prisoner mailbox rule generally); Dasilva v. Sheriff's Dept., 413 F. App'x. 498, 502 (3rd Cir. 2011) ("[The] statute of limitations is met when a complaint is submitted to the clerk before the statute runs . . . ."); and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a blank form "Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis-Non Prisoner (AO 239)"; and it is further

ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Room 4015, Newark, NJ 07101, within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order; Plaintiff's writing shall include either (1) a complete, signed in forma pauperis application, or (2) the $400 fee including the $350 filing fee plus the $50 administrative fee; and it is further

ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Plaintiff stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete in forma pauperis application or payment of the filing and administrative fees within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.

s/Esther Salas

Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Belton v. Main

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jun 6, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-6022 (ES) (D.N.J. Jun. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Belton v. Main

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL BELTON, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL MAIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jun 6, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-6022 (ES) (D.N.J. Jun. 6, 2018)