From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beloborodyy v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 22, 2014
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00797-PAB (D. Colo. Apr. 22, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00797-PAB

04-22-2014

MIKHAIL A. BELOBORODYY, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion for Attorney's Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) [Docket No. 18] filed by plaintiff Mikhail A. Beloborodyy. Plaintiff's motion indicates that the Commissioner takes no position on this request.

On March 29, 2011, plaintiff filed a Complaint [Docket No. 1] seeking review of the final decision of defendant Carolyn W. Colvin in her official capacity as the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying plaintiff's claim for disability benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33. On September 25, 2013, the Court reversed the Commissioner's denial of benefits and remanded the case for an award of benefits. Docket No. 15. Based on the remand proceedings, plaintiff was awarded past-due benefits from the Social Security Administration in the amount of $90,970.00. Docket No. 18 at 2, ¶ 4. The notice of award from the Social Security Administration withheld $22,742.50 from plaintiff's benefits in anticipation of this fee request. Id. at 4. Plaintiff received notice of this award on November 11, 2013 and filed the motion for attorney's fees on December 13, 2013. Docket No. 18 at 1. Thus, the motion is timely under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 505 (10th Cir. 2006) ("[a] motion for an award of fees under § 406(b)(1) should be filed within a reasonable time of the Commissioner's decision awarding benefits").

The caption reflects the current acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.

In the present motion, plaintiff requests that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), the Court grant his attorney, Ann J. Atkinson, $22,742.50 in attorney's fees in connection with this case. Docket No. 18 at 1. Plaintiff states that he entered into a contingent fee agreement with Ms. Atkinson wherein he agreed to pay Ms. Atkinson 25% of any past-due disability award granted upon the successful outcome of this action. Docket No. 18 at 3, ¶ 6; Docket No. 18-4. Plaintiff informs the Court that, if Ms. Atkinson is granted the requested award, then Ms. Atkinson will reimburse plaintiff for the $3,515.02 in fees awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Docket No. 18 at 6, ¶ 10.

Section 406(b) of Title 42 of the United States Code provides, in pertinent part, that "[w]henever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment."

Despite a contingent-fee agreement, courts must review the reasonableness of the fees yielded by the agreement to ensure that the attorney's recovery is based on the character of the representation and the results achieved. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). Moreover, if claimant's counsel is awarded fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), counsel must refund the smaller award to the claimant. See id. at 796.

In district court litigation, Ms. Atkinson's affidavit states that she spent 18.9 hours representing plaintiff in this case and estimates expending another three to five hours assisting plaintiff and his family in obtaining the awarded benefits. Docket No. 18-2 at 2, ¶ 3. Ms. Atkinson undertook a substantial risk of loss in connection with the case, devoted considerable time and effort in presenting plaintiff's position, and obtained a favorable result for plaintiff. In addition, Ms. Atkinson has over 26 years of experience representing claimants in Social Security disability cases, from which she has gained skills that enable her to decrease the number of hours necessary to prosecute a particular case. Morever, given that Ms. Atkinson will refund the lesser of either any attorney's fee award under the EAJA or pursuant to this motion, the net fee paid by plaintiff to Ms. Atkinson will be the agreed amount of 25% of past-due benefits. Thus, the Court concludes that an attorney's fee of $22,742.50 is reasonable.

Wherefore, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney's Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) [Docket No. 18] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff's counsel is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $22,742.50.

BY THE COURT:

__________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Beloborodyy v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 22, 2014
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00797-PAB (D. Colo. Apr. 22, 2014)
Case details for

Beloborodyy v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:MIKHAIL A. BELOBORODYY, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 22, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00797-PAB (D. Colo. Apr. 22, 2014)

Citing Cases

Geertgens v. Colvin

While that is outside Walker's fourteen-day limit, it is a reasonable amount of time under the McGraw regime.…