Summary
denying motion for leave to amend because, among other things, the motion violated Local Rule 3.01
Summary of this case from Gardner v. MutzOpinion
Case No: 8:05-cv-778-T-23TGW.
November 20, 2006
ORDER
The plaintiff sues the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs seeking review of the damages component of an administrative decision and asserting a violation of the Privacy Act based on allegedly unauthorized access to the plaintiff's medical records. United States Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson submits a report and recommendation (Doc. 32) on the defendant's motion (Doc. 13) for summary judgment. Neither party files an objection to the report and recommendation, and the time to file objections has expired. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 32) is ADOPTED, and the defendant's motion (Doc. 13) for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to (1) enter judgment for the defendant, (2) terminate any pending motion, and (3) close the file.
ORDERED.