From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bellot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
May 29, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-2014 (S.D. Tex. May. 29, 2014)

Summary

finding res judicata existed where the plaintiffs raised the same challenges in the present case as they did in the prior case regarding the defendant's ability to pursue foreclosure despite the fact that a foreclosure occurred after the prior lawsuit and before the current lawsuit

Summary of this case from Easterling v. U.S. Bank

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-2014

05-29-2014

DAVE BELLOT AND GERMAINE BELLOT, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR PARK PLACE SECURITIES, INC. ASSET-BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES WHQ2-2004, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, ANGEL REYES & ASSOCIATES, P.C., AND JOHN DOES 1-1000, Defendants.


ORDER

Pending before the Court in the above referenced action to prevent foreclosure on their property at 1801 Barbara Lane, Pasadena, Texas 77502, and asserting actions for trespass to try-title, to quiet title, and violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, are Defendants' motion to dismiss (instrument #29) Plaintiffs' First Amended Verified Complaint and United States Magistrate Judge Frances Stacy's memorandum and recommendation (#35) that the Court grant the motion based on res judicata and failure to state a cognizable claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs Dave Bellot and Germaine Bellot have not filed any objections to the memorandum and recommendation.

Standard of Review

Findings of the Magistrate Judge in a memorandum and recommendation to which no specific objections are made require the Court only to decide whether the memorandum and recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Id., citing U.S. v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5 Cir. 1989). The district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

The Court, having reviewed the briefs, the Magistrate Judge's memorandum and recommendation, and the applicable law, finds the Magistrate has correctly summarized the law and applied it to the facts in this action. Accordingly, the Court

ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's memorandum and recommendation as its own and

ORDERS that Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Final Judgment shall issue by separate order.

SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 29 day of May, 2014.

__________

MELINDA HARMON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bellot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
May 29, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-2014 (S.D. Tex. May. 29, 2014)

finding res judicata existed where the plaintiffs raised the same challenges in the present case as they did in the prior case regarding the defendant's ability to pursue foreclosure despite the fact that a foreclosure occurred after the prior lawsuit and before the current lawsuit

Summary of this case from Easterling v. U.S. Bank

finding res judicata existed where the plaintiffs raised the same challenges in the present case as they did in the prior case regarding the defendant's ability to pursue foreclosure despite the fact that a foreclosure occurred after the prior lawsuit and before the current lawsuit

Summary of this case from Smith v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y FSB

finding res judicata existed where the plaintiffs raised the exact same challenges in the present case as they did in the prior case as to the defendant's ability to pursue foreclosure despite the fact that a foreclosure occurred after the prior lawsuit and before the current lawsuit

Summary of this case from Balogun v. JP Morgan Chase
Case details for

Bellot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:DAVE BELLOT AND GERMAINE BELLOT, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: May 29, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-2014 (S.D. Tex. May. 29, 2014)

Citing Cases

Tyler v. PHH Mortg. Corp.

"[T]he relationship between a mortgage holder, a mortgage servicer, and a mortgage lender's nominee is…

Smith v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y FSB

Considered together, all of her claims are related in "motivation" and "origin" and form a "convenient trial…