Opinion
A21A1215
12-13-2023
BELL v. The STATE.
Eric C. Crawford, Monroe, for Appellant. Randal Matthew McGinley, Alexandra Jewel Stone, for Appellee.
Eric C. Crawford, Monroe, for Appellant.
Randal Matthew McGinley, Alexandra Jewel Stone, for Appellee.
Mercier, Chief Judge.
In Bell v. State, 362 Ga. App. 687, 870 S.E.2d 20 (2022), this Court, due to insufficiency of the evidence, reversed Cortney Bell’s convictions for murder in the second degree and cruelty to children in the second degree relating to the death of Bell’s infant daughter, Caliyah. Id. at 699-702 (1), 702-703 (2), 870 S.E.2d 20. We also ruled, however, that the evidence was sufficient to support a felony charge against Bell for contributing to the dependency of a minor, and we affirmed that conviction. Id. at 703-706 (3), 870 S.E.2d 20. Thereafter, our Supreme Court granted certiorari "to determine whether [this Court] erred in holding that the evidence was legally sufficient to support Bell’s conviction on that charge." Bell v. State, 317 Ga. 519, 519, 893 S.E.2d 918 (2023). Our Supreme Court held: "In the absence of evidence from which a reasonable jury could infer that Bell’s conduct proximately caused Caliyah’s death, the evidence presented to the jury was simply insufficient as a matter of constitutional due process to support her conviction for felony contributing to the dependency of a minor." Id. at 925 (citation omitted).
The Supreme Court made clear that its "review on certiorari [was] limited to the merits of [this Court's] decision related to Bell’s conviction for felony contributing to the dependency of a minor[.]" not our decisions regarding the insufficiency of the evidence to support Bell's convictions for murder in the second degree and cruelty to children in the second degree, Bell, 893 S.E.2d at 920, n. 1.
In light of our Supreme Court’s ruling, we vacate Division 3 of our prior opinion in which we found the evidence to be sufficient to support Bell’s conviction for contributing to the dependency of a minor, we adopt as our own the Supreme Court’s opinion holding that the evidence was, instead, insufficient, and we reverse the trial court’s judgment, as the evidence was insufficient to support any of Bell’s three convictions.
Judgment reversed.
Dillard, P. J., and Land, J., concur.