From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Bryan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 4, 1988
519 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. BR-449.

January 5, 1988. Rehearing Denied March 4, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, M.C. Blanchard, J.

Thomas F. Condon and J.B. Hopkins, Pensacola, and Larry E. Levy, of MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, Tallahassee, for appellants.

M.J. Menge, of Shell, Fleming, Davis Menge, Pensacola, for appellees.


Appellant, Matt Langley Bell, III, appeals from the trial court's final judgment of dismissal granting a motion to dismiss filed by the appellees/taxpayers. Bell raises the following issues in this appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in concluding that the assessments made against the appellees were against their leasehold interests, which by Florida law are defined as intangibles, and (2) whether the trial court erred in granting appellees' motion to dismiss in view of Bell's allegations that the statute of limitations barred such a challenge. We affirm.

We affirm as to Issue I based on our holding in Bell v. Bryan, 505 So.2d 690 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 513 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 1987). As to Issue II, we note that section 194.171(2), Florida Statutes (1983), applies on its face to instances where the taxpayer is in the posture of a plaintiff bringing an action contesting a tax assessment, and that in the instant case, the taxpayers are the defendants. Moreover, the Florida Supreme Court has stated that when tax assessments are void, they may be enjoined at any time. Lake Worth Towers, Inc. v. Gerstung, 262 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1972); see also Neptune Hollywood Beach Club, Inc. v. Markham, 473 So.2d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). In the instant case, the appellees argued in their motion to dismiss that the property appraiser had no authority to assess their interest in leasehold improvements as real property. Consequently, appellees were alleging that the taxes the tax collector sought to collect were void. See Lake Worth Towers, Inc. v. Gerstung, 262 So.2d at 4. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm.

The statute provides:
No action shall be brought to contest a tax assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122(2), or after 60 days from the date a decision is rendered concerning such assessment by the property appraisal adjustment board if a petition contesting the assessment had not received final action by the property appraisal adjustment board prior to extension of the roll under s. 197.0134.

ZEHMER, J., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Bell v. Bryan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 4, 1988
519 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Bell v. Bryan

Case Details

Full title:MATT LANGLEY BELL, III, AS TAX COLLECTOR OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 4, 1988

Citations

519 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Marathon Air Services, Inc. v. Higgs

Since the building is not part of the leased property, it is not exempt from ad valorem taxation under…

AGO

The court concluded that assessments on improvements titled in the county should not be at the full real…