From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Atlanta Cooperage Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 17, 1970
173 S.E.2d 427 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

45097.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 3, 1970.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 17, 1970.

Action on account. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Camp.

Stanley H. Nylen, for appellant.

Dunaway, Shelfer, Haas Newberry, Williams S. Shelfer, Jr., for appellees.


Under the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, as amended; Code Ann. Title 81A), a complaint should not be dismissed unless the averments disclose with certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of such claim. Harper v. DeFreitas, 117 Ga. App. 236, 238 ( 160 S.E.2d 260). The petition in the present case being amply sufficient to meet the requirements of the Act, and not affirmatively disclosing that complainant is not entitled to relief under facts provable under the allegations made, the trial court erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss.

Judgment reversed. Jordan, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 3, 1970 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 17, 1970.


Summaries of

Bell v. Atlanta Cooperage Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 17, 1970
173 S.E.2d 427 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

Bell v. Atlanta Cooperage Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BELL v. ATLANTA COOPERAGE COMPANY, INC. et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 17, 1970

Citations

173 S.E.2d 427 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)
173 S.E.2d 427

Citing Cases

Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co.

4. The petition in this action sought the recovery of an unpaid balance of $850.06 and attorney fees of…

Farmers Feed Fertilizer Company, Inc. v. Lynn

A complaint (or as in this case a portion thereof) should not be stricken "unless the averments disclose with…