From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Flores

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 7, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4379 (N.Y. 2012)

Opinion

2012-06-7

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Ramon FLORES, Appellant.

Anna Jost, Tonawanda, for appellant. Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Thomas H. Brandt of counsel), for respondent.


Anna Jost, Tonawanda, for appellant. Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Thomas H. Brandt of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant Ramon Flores was convicted, following a jury trial, of one count of first-degree sexual abuse, two counts of first-degree rape, two counts of first-degree attempted sodomy and one count of first-degree sodomy. He was subsequently sentenced to 20 years in prison to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. On appeal, the Appellate Division exercised its interest of justice jurisdiction to reverse that part of the judgment convicting defendant of first-degree attempted sodomy under one of the counts of the indictment, dismissed that count and otherwise affirmed (83 A.D.3d 1460, 919 N.Y.S.2d 747 [4th Dept.2011] ).

Defendant's indictment was based, in part, on the nine-year old complainant's videotaped testimony for the grand jury. The district attorney provided defendant's trial counsel with a copy of the transcript of the complainant's grand jury testimony, and trial counsel viewed the videotape at the district attorney's offices. Defendant argues that CPL 240.45 and People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, 213 N.Y.S.2d 448, 173 N.E.2d 881 (1961) obligated the People to provide trial counsel with a copy of the videotape. But trial counsel did not object to the arrangements made by the district attorney for him to view the videotape; nor did he ever request a copy of it. This issue is therefore not preserved for appellate review ( People v. Jackson, 78 N.Y.2d 900, 573 N.Y.S.2d 452, 577 N.E.2d 1044 [1991] ). We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Flores

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 7, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4379 (N.Y. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Ramon FLORES, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4379 (N.Y. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4379
948 N.Y.S.2d 575
971 N.E.2d 856

Citing Cases

People v. Rojas-Aponte

It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Onondaga…

People v. Robinson

Likewise, defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, to the extent that it relates to the…