Opinion
April 30, 1964
Order, entered on February 14, 1964, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Order, entered on February 27, 1964 denying a motion to vacate a prior order appointing a receiver, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to the extent of terminating the receivership upon plaintiffs-appellants paying to the receiver the sum of $100 and his actual expenses, including the premium upon the bond, if such a premium was paid by the receiver. Special Term was fully justified in appointing the receiver, in view of the parties' suggestion and agreement in open court that such an appointment be made. The litigation, however, was settled and discontinued within a week after the entry of the order of appointment; and it does not appear that the receiver entered into possession of the premises, received any of the funds in dispute or performed any services beyond those possibly involved in qualifying pursuant to the order of appointment. Settle order on notice.
Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.