From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Behrman v. Behrman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 31, 1979
376 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 79-449.

October 31, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Vernon W. Evans, Jr., J.

Stevan T. Northcutt of Levine, Freedman, Hirsch Levinson, Tampa, for appellant.

Russell K. Peavyhouse of Peavyhouse, Giglio, Grant, Clark, Charlton Mount, Tampa, for appellee.


Donald M. Behrman appeals from the provisions of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, alleging the court erred in making an award of lump sum alimony to appellee and in refusing appellant a special equity in a jointly owned $7,000.00 certificate of deposit.

We affirm all aspects of the final judgment except the denial of a special equity in the certificate of deposit. Appellant testified that the certificate was purchased after his mother's death with funds directly from her estate account. Although some funds from the estate were mingled in the parties' other joint accounts, only estate funds were used to open the account in question. We hold that the ownership rights are easily ascertainable because the funds came from a source unconnected with the marital relationship, and that the subsequent action of the parties in keeping the funds separate from co-mingled funds is consistent with a "no gift" presumption. Lawless v. Lawless, 362 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). See Ball v. Ball, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1976).

REMANDED for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Behrman v. Behrman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 31, 1979
376 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Behrman v. Behrman

Case Details

Full title:DONALD M. BEHRMAN, APPELLANT, v. MARTHA MAE BEHRMAN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 31, 1979

Citations

376 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Walser v. Walser

Although the wife, in hindsight, claims that she did not intend a gift of her inheritance to the husband, her…

Spielberger v. Spielberger

Thus, no commingling occurred to create a presumption of a gift. See generally Lyons v. Lyons, 687 So.2d 837…