From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beckwith v. the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 19, 1913
103 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1913)

Opinion

Argued December 5, 1913

Decided December 19, 1913

Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( William E.C. Mayer, Terence Farley and R. Percy Chittenden of counsel), for appellant.

Edward M. Grout and James F. McKinney for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK and HOGAN, JJ. Not sitting: MILLER, J.


Summaries of

Beckwith v. the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 19, 1913
103 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1913)
Case details for

Beckwith v. the City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CLINTON BECKWITH, Respondent, v . THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 19, 1913

Citations

103 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1913)
103 N.E. 1121

Citing Cases

Matter of People's Trust Co.

The cases cannot be distinguished in principle. An examination of the record in the Herzog Case (State Law…

Condon-Cunningham v. Day

No helpful purpose can be served by extending this opinion through the detailed discussions of other cases,…