From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beck v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 13, 1955
221 F.2d 566 (9th Cir. 1955)

Opinion

No. 13979.

April 13, 1955.

Tobriner Lazarus, Leland J. Lazarus, Stanley H. Neyhart, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Lloyd H. Burke, U.S. Atty., Frederick J. Woelflen, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HEALY and FEE, Circuit Judges, and JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.


This is a suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. Appellant while employed in unloading a freight car, was injured by a fork-lift operated and controlled by an employee of the United States. His suit for damages was tried to the court sitting without a jury. The court found that the injury was not caused by any negligence on the part of the government or its employees, and that appellant was guilty of negligence contributing to his injury. Judgment was accordingly entered in favor of the United States.

The evidence on these points was in conflict. The findings of the court were predicated on substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.


Summaries of

Beck v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 13, 1955
221 F.2d 566 (9th Cir. 1955)
Case details for

Beck v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Fred BECK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 13, 1955

Citations

221 F.2d 566 (9th Cir. 1955)

Citing Cases

Yellowstone Pipe Line Company v. Kuczynski

See also, Benson v. Brady, 1953, 73 Idaho 553, 255 P.2d 710. Under any of the circumstances referred to in…