From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beck v. City of Niagara Falls

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 26, 2019
171 A.D.3d 1573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

MOTION NO. (1461/18) CA 18-01324

04-26-2019

Daniel J. BECK and Debra Beck, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, et al., Defendants, and Niagara Falls Water Board, Defendant-Appellant.


Motion for reargument be and the same hereby is granted to the extent that, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered February 8, 2019 ( 169 A.D.3d 1528, 92 N.Y.S.3d 845 ) is amended by deleting the third sentence of the memorandum and substituting the following sentence: "Plaintiffs allege that the Niagara Falls Water Board (defendant) was responsible for the care and maintenance of the area on Simmons Avenue where the incident is alleged to have occurred."


Summaries of

Beck v. City of Niagara Falls

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 26, 2019
171 A.D.3d 1573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Beck v. City of Niagara Falls

Case Details

Full title:Daniel J. BECK and Debra Beck, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CITY OF NIAGARA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 26, 2019

Citations

171 A.D.3d 1573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
97 N.Y.S.3d 546

Citing Cases

Metcalf v. Cnty. of Erie

The County defendants relatedly contend that, to the extent plaintiff properly asserted under the second…

L & M Grp. v. Lipsitz

We agree with plaintiffs that the motion to the extent that it sought summary judgment dismissing the…