From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Becher v. Peress

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1985
111 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

June 24, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

The law is settled that covenants restricting a professional, and in particular a physician, from competing with a former employer or associate are generally acceptable and enforceable ( see, e.g., Gelder Med. Group v. Webber, 41 N.Y.2d 680, 683) and are not violative of General Business Law § 340 ( see, Matter of Freeman, 34 N.Y.2d 1; People v. Roth, 52 N.Y.2d 440, 447). Special Term properly refused to dismiss defendant's counterclaims seeking to enforce the agreement in question.

Under the circumstances of this case, including the equities involved, the preliminary injunction was properly granted to maintain the status quo between the parties.

We have considered plaintiff's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Becher v. Peress

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1985
111 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Becher v. Peress

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY A. BECHER, Appellant, v. J. AARON PERESS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Budoff v. Jenkins

The second affirmative defense, by which Jenkins asserted that the restrictive covenants are against public…