From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Becerra v. Doe

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 19, 2008
07-CV-3414 (JMR/JJG) (D. Minn. Nov. 19, 2008)

Summary

adopting R. & R.

Summary of this case from Thomas v. Roy

Opinion

07-CV-3414 (JMR/JJG).

November 19, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation, issued October 6, 2008 [Docket No. 223], by the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge. The Report recommended that plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction, and to enforce a preliminary injunction, be denied. Plaintiff pro se filed objections pursuant to Local Rule 72.2; although the objections were not timely filed, the Court has considered them.

Based on a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction [Docket No. 65] and to enforce a preliminary injunction [Docket No. 87] are denied.


Summaries of

Becerra v. Doe

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 19, 2008
07-CV-3414 (JMR/JJG) (D. Minn. Nov. 19, 2008)

adopting R. & R.

Summary of this case from Thomas v. Roy
Case details for

Becerra v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:Erik Becerra v. John Doe et al

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 19, 2008

Citations

07-CV-3414 (JMR/JJG) (D. Minn. Nov. 19, 2008)

Citing Cases

Wheatley v. Quist

"As a practical matter, once adverse parties have notice and an opportunity to oppose a temporary restraining…

Thomas v. Roy

Thus if other injuries occur during litigation, but those injuries are not related to the conduct alleged in…