From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beauvoir v. Samuel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 13, 2022
204 A.D.3d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2019–09995 Index No. 520509/18

04-13-2022

Nadege BEAUVOIR, appellant, v. Toribip SAMUEL, et al., respondents.

Subin Associates, LLP (Robert J. Eisen and Pollack Pollack Isaac & DeCicco LLP, New York, NY [Brian J. Isaac and Greg Freeman], of counsel), for appellant. Kelly, Rode & Kelly, LLP, Mineola, NY (Eric P. Tosca of counsel), for respondents.


Subin Associates, LLP (Robert J. Eisen and Pollack Pollack Isaac & DeCicco LLP, New York, NY [Brian J. Isaac and Greg Freeman], of counsel), for appellant.

Kelly, Rode & Kelly, LLP, Mineola, NY (Eric P. Tosca of counsel), for respondents.

BETSY BARROS, J.P., REINALDO E. RIVERA, PAUL WOOTEN, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Francois A. Rivera, J.), dated July 26, 2019. The order denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On January 23, 2017, the plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries when a vehicle that she was operating was struck in the rear by a vehicle operated by the defendant Toribip Samuel and owned by the defendant Green Oil Recycling, Inc. (hereinafter Green Oil). Prior to the completion of discovery and before party depositions had occurred, the plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. In support of her motion, the plaintiff submitted only her own conclusory affidavit in which she averred that she was driving a vehicle westbound on Bergen Street in Brooklyn when a vehicle "which [she] later learned" to be operated by Samuel and owned by Green Oil struck her vehicle in the rear. In an order dated July 26, 2019, the Supreme Court denied the motion. The plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.

"A conclusory affidavit or an affidavit by an individual without personal knowledge of the facts does not establish the proponent's prima facie burden" on a motion for summary judgment ( JMD Holding Corp. v. Congress Fin. Corp., 4 N.Y.3d 373, 384–385, 795 N.Y.S.2d 502, 828 N.E.2d 604 ; see Vermette v. Kenworth Truck Co., 68 N.Y.2d 714, 506 N.Y.S.2d 313, 497 N.E.2d 680 ; Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Gordon, 171 A.D.3d 197, 201, 97 N.Y.S.3d 286 ; McGinley v. Mystic W. Realty Corp., 117 A.D.3d 504, 985 N.Y.S.2d 528 ; Coleman v. Maclas, 61 A.D.3d 569, 569, 877 N.Y.S.2d 297 ). Here, the plaintiff's conclusory affidavit, which was based upon unidentified sources, was insufficient to establish, prima facie, that a vehicle operated by Samuel and owned by Green Oil struck her vehicle in the rear.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642 ).

BARROS, J.P., RIVERA, WOOTEN and DOWLING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Beauvoir v. Samuel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 13, 2022
204 A.D.3d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Beauvoir v. Samuel

Case Details

Full title:Nadege BEAUVOIR, appellant, v. Toribip SAMUEL, et al., respondents.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 13, 2022

Citations

204 A.D.3d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
164 N.Y.S.3d 462

Citing Cases

Zeldin v. Larose

[1, 2] "A plaintiff in a negligence action moving for summary judgment on the issue of liability must…

Zeldin v. Larose

"A plaintiff in a negligence action moving for summary judgment on the issue of liability must establish,…