Opinion
Argued April 17, 1894
Decided May 1, 1894
James R. Cox for appellant.
F.D. Wright, for respondents.
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Beardsley v. Gaylord
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1894
142 N.Y. 662 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
Beardsley v. Gaylord
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1894
142 N.Y. 662 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
Beardsley v. Gaylord
Case Details
Full title:NELSON BEARDSLEY, Appellant, v . ARTHUR M. GAYLORD et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 1, 1894
Citations
142 N.Y. 662 (N.Y. 1894)
60 N.Y. St. Rptr. 868
Citing Cases
Wood v. McGuire
Such an order cannot be sustained. Gaylord v. Beardsley, 46 N.Y. St. Repr. 523. The court directed that the…
Pope v. Kelly"Where matter alleged to be irrelevant is not obviously so, but requires an elaborate argument to show its…