Summary
rejecting inmate's claim that being forced to sleep directly on the floor during periods of overcrowding violated his Eighth Amendment rights, holding: "[a]lthough Plaintiff may argue that he had an absolute right to bedding, no such right exists."
Summary of this case from Sifford v. HallOpinion
CV 108-002.
July 14, 2008
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
SO ORDERED.