From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bean v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
Case No. CV 09-9216 GHK (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 09-9216 GHK (JCG)

10-20-2011

KRISTOPHER BEAN, Petitioner, v. DERAL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections generally reiterate the arguments made in the Petition and Traverse, and lack merit for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and
3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

HON. GEORGE H. KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bean v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
Case No. CV 09-9216 GHK (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Bean v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:KRISTOPHER BEAN, Petitioner, v. DERAL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 09-9216 GHK (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)