From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BDC Mgmt. Servs., LLC v. Singer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2016
144 A.D.3d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-29-2016

BDC MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Scott SINGER, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP, New York (Anthony D. Dougherty of counsel), for appellants. Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP, New York (Maryann C. Stallone of counsel), for respondents.


Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP, New York (Anthony D. Dougherty of counsel), for appellants.

Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP, New York (Maryann C. Stallone of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered on or about January 7, 2016, which granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs demonstrated the requisite likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury absent the injunction, and a balance of the equities in their favor (see Manhattan Real Estate Equities Group LLC v. Pine Equity, NY, Inc., 16 A.D.3d 292, 791 N.Y.S.2d 418 [1st Dept.2005] ). Defendants do not dispute that they agreed to non-competition and non-solicitation covenants in connection with the sale of their business and good will to plaintiffs and that they later acted in violation of those covenants. Irreparable injury is presumed from the breach of such restrictive covenants, since they are intended to protect the purchase of a business and the accompanying goodwill (id.; see Purchasing Assoc. v. Weitz, 13 N.Y.2d 267, 246 N.Y.S.2d 600, 196 N.E.2d 245 [1963] ; Lund v. Agmata Washington Enters., 190 A.D.2d 577, 578, 593 N.Y.S.2d 517 [1st Dept.1993] ). In fact, the parties agreed in the sale agreement that a breach of the non-compete provision would cause irreparable injury and that injunctive relief would be appropriate in the event of such a breach.

We have considered defendants' remaining arguments, including that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over the nonparty employer Shared Services LLC, its employees, and defendant Scott Singer's law practice, and find them unavailing.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., RENWICK, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

BDC Mgmt. Servs., LLC v. Singer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2016
144 A.D.3d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

BDC Mgmt. Servs., LLC v. Singer

Case Details

Full title:BDC MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Scott…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 29, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8006
41 N.Y.S.3d 419

Citing Cases

Vector Media, LLC v. Go N.Y. Tours Inc.

The agreement clearly provides that defendant would provide plaintiff with the exclusive right to sell and…

D&A Woodlands Enter., Inc. v. Sinatra

The evidence of defendant's breach was of sufficient strength to warrant a finding that plaintiff was likely…