From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bd. of Trs. of the Cement Masons Health & Welfare Trust Fund for N. Cal. v. C & C Concrete, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division
Mar 18, 2013
No. C 10-03343 LB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 10-03343 LB

03-18-2013

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA et al., Plaintiffs, v. C AND C CONCRETE, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE


[Re: ECF No. 79]

On July 29, 2010, Plaintiffs - the trustees of employee benefits plans for masons and other covered employees in the construction industry - filed a complaint against Defendants C and C Concrete, Inc. ("C & C Concrete") and Jose R. Herrera, Jr. (collectively, "Defendants"), for failing to pay employee fringe benefits and make monthly reports in violation of the parties' collective bargaining agreement, the trust agreements, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). See Complaint, ECF No. 1 at 1-2, ¶ 1.

Citations are to the Electronic Case File ("ECF") with pin cites to the electronic page number at the top of the document, not the pages at the bottom.

After serving Defendants with the complaints and summons, Plaintiffs, on September 3, 2010, requested that the Clerk of the Court enter default against Defendants for failing to answer its complaint. Complaint, ECF No. 1; Proof of Service, ECF No. 4 (Herrera); Proof of Service, ECF No. 5 (C & C Concrete); Request for Clerk's Entry of Default, ECF No. 6. A few days later, the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants. Entry of Default, ECF No. 15.

On May 18, 2011, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), ECF No. 32. After serving Defendants with the amended complaint and Defendants failed to answer it, Plaintiffs requested the Clerk of the Court to enter default against Defendants under the amended complaint. Certificate of Services, ECF No. 34, 35; Motion for Entry of Default, ECF No. 38. On August 17, 2011, the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants. Soon thereafter, Defendants filed an answer. Answer, ECF No. 42. In response, the parties filed, and the court granted, a stipulation to vacate the August 17, 2011 entry of default. Stipulation, ECF No. 44; Stipulation and Order, ECF No. 45.

Defendants were originally represented by attorney Scott Woodall. The court subsequently granted Mr. Woodall's motion to withdraw. See Order Granting Defendants' Counsel's Motion to Withdraw, ECF No. 66 at 1. In the order, the court noted that "corporations may not appear in federal court except through counsel," see N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 3-9(b), and ordered C & C Concrete to file a substitution of counsel by June 29, 2012. Id. at 3. After C & C Concrete failed to obtain a substitute counsel, Plaintiffs asked the court to strike C & C Concrete's answer to the amended complaint. See Plaintiffs' Case Management Conference Statement, ECF No. 68 at 3. A few months thereafter, the court struck C & C Concrete's answer and invited Plaintiffs to seek C & C Concrete's entry of default and to proceed with a motion for default judgment. Order Striking Answer, ECF No. 74.

On July 31, 2012, and at Plaintiffs' request, the court dismissed Mr. Herrera from the case based on his bankruptcy discharge. See Notice of Discharge and Order, ECF No. 70. Therefore, the only Defendant left in this suit is C & C Concrete.
--------

In the court's August 2, 2012 order, the court stated, "If C & C Concrete's answer is stricken, Plaintiffs then will be permitted to apply for entry of default judgment and default judgment against it." Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 73. After stipulating to vacate the August 17, 2011 entry of default, Plaintiffs did not ever request that the Clerk of the Court enter C & C Concrete's default again. Therefore, there is presently no entry of default against C & C Concrete. Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against C & C Concrete. Plaintiffs are free to refile their motion for default judgment, but only after filing a request for entry of default with Clerk of the Court and receiving an entry of default.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Bd. of Trs. of the Cement Masons Health & Welfare Trust Fund for N. Cal. v. C & C Concrete, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division
Mar 18, 2013
No. C 10-03343 LB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Bd. of Trs. of the Cement Masons Health & Welfare Trust Fund for N. Cal. v. C & C Concrete, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

No. C 10-03343 LB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)