From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bay Park One v. Crosby

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 13, 1981
109 Misc. 2d 47 (N.Y. App. Term 1981)

Opinion

April 13, 1981

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, GEORGE M. FLEARY, J.

Kenneth P. Mintz and Raymond M. D'Erasmo for appellant.


MEMORANDUM.

Final judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remanded to the court below for a new trial.

A tenant is not entitled to recover consequential damages for a landlord's breach of the implied warranty of habitability (see Curry v New York City Housing Auth., 77 A.D.2d 534). The measure of damages for such a breach is the difference between the fair market value of the premises if they had been as warranted, or measured by the rent reserved under the lease, and the value of the premises during the period of the breach (see Park West Mgt. Corp. v Mitchell, 47 N.Y.2d 316, cert den 444 U.S. 992). In addition, where the lease so provides, a landlord is entitled to recover from the tenant, as additional rent, legal expenses incurred in the prosecution of a summary proceeding (1 Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant [2d ed], § 358).

Concur: BUSCHMANN, HIRSCH and KUNZEMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Bay Park One v. Crosby

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 13, 1981
109 Misc. 2d 47 (N.Y. App. Term 1981)
Case details for

Bay Park One v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:BAY PARK ONE COMPANY, Appellant, v. DAVE CROSBY, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1981

Citations

109 Misc. 2d 47 (N.Y. App. Term 1981)
442 N.Y.S.2d 837

Citing Cases

Wade v. Jobe

See Glasoe v. Trinkle, 88 Ill.Dec. at 101, 479 N.E.2d at 921; Darmetko v. Boston Housing Auth., 378 Mass.…

Community Assocs. v. Croswell

The courts generally say that the appropriate measure of damage is the difference between the fair market…