From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bay Islip Associates v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2006
27 A.D.3d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-07998.

March 7, 2006.

In a condemnation proceeding, the claimant appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, and the defendant cross-appeals, on the ground of excessiveness, from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Scuccimarra, J.), dated August 3, 2004, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the claimant and against the defendant in the principal sum of $214,281.

Flower, Medalie Markowitz, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Edward Flower of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Patrick J. Walsh of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Before: Adams, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the award to the principal sum of $71,092; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Court of Claims for the entry of an appropriate amended judgement.

The claimant's property is located in the Town of Islip at the southwest corner of Montauk Highway (also known as Route 27A) and Saxon Avenue. The subject property contains four buildings, comprising approximately 58,150 square feet, which house a supermarket, laundromat, bank, restaurant, and medical office space. In 1956 the claimant's predecessor-in-title deeded to the Town of Islip a 25-foot strip of land along the property's easterly border with Saxon Avenue. However, in 1957 the Town agreed that the claimant's predecessor-in-title could make "full use" of the 25-foot strip of land for parking. In 1999 the State of New York appropriated approximately 5,616 square feet of the claimant's property running along its northerly border with Montauk Highway, including part of the 25-foot strip of land along Saxon Avenue, for a highway expansion.

The defendant contends, inter alia, that the Court of Claims erred in awarding severance damages for the loss of parking located on the Town-owned land along the property's easterly border with Saxon Avenue. The claimant argues, inter alia, that the Court of Claims erred in failing to award severance damages for the loss of parking along the property's northerly border with Montauk Highway due to the taking.

The Court of Claims erred in awarding severance damages to the claimant in the sum of $143,189 for the loss of parking on the Town-owned land along Saxon Avenue. Assuming that the claimant had a right to compensation for any loss of parking on the Town-owned land to which it had full use of pursuant to the 1957 agreement ( see Matter of Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. Lord, 39 NY2d 628), the claimant failed to demonstrate that there would be inadequate parking after the taking ( see Ekorb Assoc. v. State of New York, 41 AD2d 794; cf. Martabano v. State of New York, 120 AD2d 712).

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Bay Islip Associates v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2006
27 A.D.3d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Bay Islip Associates v. State

Case Details

Full title:BAY ISLIP ASSOCIATES, Appellant-Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 7, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1566
813 N.Y.S.2d 97

Citing Cases

Lebov, LLC v. State

As the court noted, the claimant did not present evidence that the potential expansion was physically…

Bay Islip, v. State of New York

Decided June 13, 2006. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 27 AD3d 407. Motions For Leave To Appeal.…