From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bauman v. Goldthorpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1908
129 App. Div. 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

November 27, 1908.

Charles B. Mason, for the appellant.

Gregg, Frank De Witt, for the respondent.


The demurrer that the complaint did not state facts sufficient was properly sustained. On petition by an administrator of an intestate the Surrogate's court may make a decree empowering him to sell real estate of the intestate to pay debts and funeral expenses; and thereupon, but after first filing in the said court his bond with two sureties, in a penalty to be fixed by the Surrogate, for the faithful per formance of his duties, he shall have the same power of sale of such real estate as if he were acting as executor under a will of the decedent containing a power of sale of real estate to pay debts and funeral expenses (Code Civ. Pro. §§ 2750 et seq.). Until such decree has been made, and he is under the sanction of such bond, he has no power to make a contract of sale. If he make one it is void.

The interlocutory judgment should be affirmed.

WOODWARD, HOOKER, RICH and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Bauman v. Goldthorpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1908
129 App. Div. 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Bauman v. Goldthorpe

Case Details

Full title:EMMA BAUMAN, Appellant, v . MARY A. GOLDTHORPE, as Administratrix, etc.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 27, 1908

Citations

129 App. Div. 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
113 N.Y.S. 136

Citing Cases

Matter of Goldburg

the premises when he entered into the lease with her testator and never has had title thereto; that his…