From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bauder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 4, 2000
768 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 3D00-263

Opinion filed October 4, 2000. July Term, A.D. 2000

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ronald C. Dresnick, Judge; Lower Tribunal No. 91-503.

Michael Bauder, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Gary K. Milligan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.


We reverse the order denying defendant's post-conviction relief motion and remand for further proceedings. Under State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1996), and its progeny, defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether trial counsel misrepresented to defendant the amount of time defendant would serve on his sentence. Bell v. State, 746 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Rensoli v. State, 718 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); see Rivero v. State, 744 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Bauder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 4, 2000
768 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Bauder v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BAUDER, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 4, 2000

Citations

768 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Pierre v. State

We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. Under State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1996),…

Jordan v. State

Under State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1996), affirmative misadvice regarding the amount of time to be…